"The Earth is being devastated
by mankind's continued exploitation, and it seems obvious that the environment
will collapse sometime in the near future. Rather than adopt a more
eco-friendly approach to life, most people have instead invested in a
"claustrosphere", a dome-shaped habitat in which all water, food and
air is endlessly recycled in a completely closed environment. A person can
therefore survive indefinitely within a claustrosphere no matter what
ecological horrors may happen outside. British writer, Nathan, who is
attempting to sell an idea for a claustrosphere commercial to Plastic Tolstoy,
owner and chief marketer of the company which builds them. The commercial
represents a change in emphasis for the advertising campaign; up to now
claustropheres have been sold as a kind of fall-back insurance, just in case
the environment collapses. However, now that virtually everybody owns at least
a basic model, sales are falling and the company is having to try and sell
upgrade and improvement packages instead. The new advertising, therefore,
attempts to convince people for the first time that the environment truly is
doomed and they are inevitably going to have to live in their claustrospheres."
Despite the heaviness to the plot, comedian Ben
Elton’s (The Young Ones, Blackadder) third novel, This Other Eden, also takes a
satirical approach to environmentalism. So despite some the serious themes,
there is enough humor to make this a fun (if overlong) tale about the fact the
planet is dying and no one really sees anyway to solve it because, as always,
it’s costs money and there is no profit in the end. Fear, however, has always
been and will always be, is what drives media corporations, politicians, and
even environmentalists to make gobs of money and never solve any of the planets
problems.
The book takes place in
different parts of the world, including Los Angele and Ireland, and other European
cities and we never get an actual date of when this takes place,
beyond it being set “in the near future.” But Elton appeared to be prescient on
a few things, like gender,
“Judy was a man, even though he
had a woman’s name. He was called Judy because he had been unfortunate enough
to be born during the time of the great gender realignment. A period when it
was commonly held belief in the University commons-rooms of the world that all
single sex imagery was oppressive. This was a time when men were strongly
encouraged not to grow beards, which were seen as a visual assertions of
gender, whereas it became fashionable for women to be as hairy as possible, in
order to blur the margins. The idea was that if everyone could pretend to be
exactly the same then no one could be held back by being different and hence,
it was argued, the individual would be in a position to prosper”
Also mobile
phones, and daytime TV that focuses on how easy it is to exploit people’s problems
for profit. He is also able to capture the insanity of how sometimes doing good
can be bad, and how one person can convince the mass audience that they are the
best person to save the world.
While released thirty years ago, the books
themes are pretty relevant today as it probably was when it was published. While
wild and unbelievable in some aspects, back in 1993, many would say it was
science fiction and no one would let the Earth die for profit.
“The fact
was, the cynics in Mother Earth have been naïve as everyone else in the world
about the nature of government. The basic perception of modern society is that
‘they’ (that big, catch-all term for the powers that be) are at least
attempting to look after our best interest. That there is a logical and at
least partially benign force which watches over us, and for which we pay our
taxes. Certainly, we think that ‘they’ are, in the main, a bunch of
hypocritical bastards on the make, but deep down we presume that at heart they
want what’s best for us. “Surely ‘they’ wouldn’t let us drink polluted water?”
we say to ourselves. “Surely ‘they’ would tell us if the food was poisonous.
Surely they would never stitch people up for crimes those people did not commit
and put them away for 20 years without appeal?”
In the
end, I found I like the book and highly recommend it. Yes, it can be depressing
sometimes, but there is always a good joke around the corner (something comedians
are great at). And maybe that’s why anyone who does read, understand that the
truths written in a novel thirty years ago are still going on today. Because
the book does not give any real solutions, ironically, but does offer some
thoughts on if we work together, instead being opposing forces, Earth may
recover from the destruction humans have done to it over (honestly) a very
short time period.