Here’s the thing: The right-wing conservative believes American’s
should be the ones who vote for gay marriage, not the “activist judges.” Think
back to the general presidential election of 2000. Without the Electoral
College, George W. Bush would have never been elected president, because the popular
vote, the will of the people, would have swept Al Gore into office. The GOP
defended the College for doing what it should do, whether that was good or bad
is not up for debate.
Here’s the thing, I believe they should if only because the
people make irrational, emotional decisions based on little regard for reality. Seriously,
has anyone seen who votes for whom on American Idol? It’s a popularity game
show designed not for the talented folks of the world, but about people who can
be packaged, labeled and sold to an American audience who are awash in mediocrity.
This is why no one on that show has had a sustainable career outside certain
niche markets, which is as it should be. It's a microcosm of why sometimes the will of the people need to be trumped by a judicial decree.
As a nation, we’ve moved on from our simple beginnings, we’ve
evolved because nature, time and tide moved us forward whether we like it or
not (some will argue we’ve moved too fast, but who decides that?). The 20th
Century alone showed a world that moved from the most basic car, Model T, to
men walking on the moon; to space probes hunting the origins of the universe
when that century started people still believed there was nothing beyond this
little marble of a world. We also went from being tethered to our phones (and
computers) to ones where it (almost) matters not where you are. We’ve moved
forward, because we had people who knew that the key to growth lies not in the
past, but in the unknown future.
I understand that gay marriage undermines certain religious
views. The question remains why we’ve let these views color how a state, a
country, a world manages its people. I’ve no doubt religion is a good idea,
offers light when darkness surrounds the soul of the people, but it should remain
a personal thing, kept out of politics, kept out of secular laws of this nation.
Ah yes, the second most dirty word the conservatives think
is destroying America, secularism (liberal is another word, but it’s basically
the same meaning to them).
The way I see it, we’ve always have been somewhat secular
nation, but because the religion was able to suppress people, use blackmail and
ignorance of the nation to prop up its views, the few forward thinking people
were kept out, called heretics because their views went against state policy.
But as fast as we’ve moved from horse and buggy to supersonic airplanes, those
forward thinking people have moved from the fringe to center stage, which has
scared a lot of religious people who’ve had it good for generations. Their power
base is breaking apart like the nation’s infrastructure, and it frightens them
because they only solution they can up with is increase the fear factor. Yes, conservatism
has always played on fear, but it also thrives on lies and dishonesty. Conservatism
hasn’t given us anything we didn’t have and it wants to take away our freedoms,
because they’ve not given us any sort of stable social order, or a peaceful
home life, or a respect for law and order.
We’re at the crossroads now, and whether we survive as a
nation is up to a handful of people who think by accident of birth and
circumstance, they were meant to rule the world and those who did not agree
would suffer. They need to be swept aside to move forward for we are a species
who cannot abide stagnation. Change has always been at the heart of what we
are.
I can see that our Founding Fathers never thought beyond
their own lives, though, leaving complex issues like this in the hands of
future generations. As a people we never look for what’s in front of us, mostly
because it scares us. Living in the past makes us happy, because it does not
require much thought; we’ve always done it this way, we should always then do
it this way. It’s backwards thinking and it’s destructive, because as a nation
we would never have evolved beyond our puritanical roots had not some stood up
and said “what if.”
Is 200 years too short of time? Should we sit and debate a
simple issue as this for another 200? Should we go through committee after
committee because a bunch of religious folks who feel their power slipping
through their fingers like sand can’t get over an “ick” factor?
It’s all fun and games to claim that the only reason we live
is to reproduce, but the fact is that as species, we are living longer and
longer than when this nation (alone) was founded. Problems these Founding Fathers could never
think of, like the huge population growth that has happened even in my lifetime
(I’ll be 50 in September, and the population has grown more in those 50 than
the previous 50), are creating new problems that require new solutions. So be
it the evolutionary aspect of said species or a healthier lifestyle or a
combination of both, mathematically this planet will not be able to sustain us
all if we don’t figure out a logical solution to this problem. But today’s
leaders don’t want to worry about the future, they’ll let the next, next, next
generation deal with it. And that, my friends is stupid.
I believe in gay marriage because of what it stands for: it
brings two people together to form one and bring up (if they choose) another
generation. Marriage is good, and to stop a man from marrying another man, or a
woman marrying another woman is ridiculous. We all want to be loved, and have
people see that love. And we can reproduce, be it a surrogate or adoption, so we
just do it differently. Is that so wrong? And the fallacy that people will want
to marry dogs, cats, cows, buildings if gay people are allowed to wed is
nothing but the empty rhetoric of a defeated dictatorship. It’s smoke and
mirrors to cover up bigotry and hate, one the most ruthless traits of the human
race.
And I believe the solutions lies in science and not prayer,
I believe that as a nation, we’ll solve these problems only if we retain logic,
compassion and a soul. It’s become clear that the conservative movement is on
the wrong side of history, and I think deep down they know it. And I suppose
like any good fighter, they’ll battle until both sides are hurt, wounded, and dead
perhaps. They’ve made it clear they want no accommodation from me or anyone who
opposes their backwards view.
A very well written and enlighten post. However, I disagree about gay marriage. It's great PR to market is as love and not all that different from straight marriage but it's also not accurate. GLBT's have always been able to and have had religious marriages. It may not be sanctioned by the religious institution but finding a priest or minister or rabbi or any official was not hard.
ReplyDeleteTo have your marriage recognized by the government and have all the rights that comes with CIVIL marriage, even straight people must have government approval or a license and that is what GLBT people need and want - for themselves, their family, their finances, their security and their equality.
Religious marriage means nothing to government, it's that little piece of paper you can get in five minutes at a dry-thru window manned by Elvis that the government needs.