As a long time reader, it may surprise some that I never
read Harper Lee’s 1960 best-selling novel To
Kill A Mockingbird. I offer no excuse, really. I know a lot of people who've
read in high school, where even today, it’s still considered mandatory,
especially for AP students. But for some reason, the book -and the film
version- remained unread, unseen. That changed this past week when PBS aired on
their American Masters series, a documentary on the novel.
Of course, the funny part was, I owned a copy of the novel,
bought it a few years ago. Like so many books that I buy, I knew eventually I
would get to it. Granted, it was not high on my list, but I was going to get to
it. I’ve been reading The Count of Monte
Cristo for the last few weeks, and am finding myself struggling through the
19th Century prose. I’ve read where some readers will give up on
books that don’t hold their interest, but I feel once I start one, I have to
finish it. But Cristo –in this Modern Library version I’m reading is 1426
pages, and I’m only 210 pages in after about three weeks or so of reading.
Logically, I guess, with all else I have yet to read –and just got the new
Christopher Moore title- I should just abandon the book (like I did Charles
Dickens). But I like a challenge, so I will continue to read Dumas, but may
take time to read something else, like Moore (and at the end of April bring’s
Stephen King’s next Dark Tower book,
plus a Star Trek book I do want to
read).
Anyways.
So after the PBS special aired, which I thought was
fabulous, I got it into my head that I finally needed to read the novel (and a
day later, I was in Target and saw the Blu-ray version on sale for $14.95, so I
purchased that). Needless to say, I devoured the novel in a day.
I can’t review a book that has been done so much better by
others over the last 50 years, but I will say while the novel is basically an
old fashion tale of the happenings in a small town in Alabama, it’s themes of
courage, family and the ugliness of racism resonates even today. And by telling
the story through the eyes of a child, a brilliant stroke if there was any, it’s
able to bring its metaphors sharply into focus without being preachy.
Jem, Scout, Dill and Atticus launch off the page, and become
living, breathing characters. Through those innocent eyes, we see children
trying to comprehend a world that is changing around them, but it’s also a town
caught-up in the crossroad of history. Lee’s prose drags you in, forcing you (unintentionally,
of course) to re-evaluate the perceptions of people.
As a child, our universe is pretty small. Most of us grew-up
where our neighborhood were divided by homes where I parents said this far and
no further. And how many of us had a creepy, mysterious how that harbored some
person who for reasons we never fully understood then, was a boogeyman? Boo
Radley is Jem and Scout’s boogeyman, but we learn that the one we need to be afraid
of is not the person we cannot see, but the one that stands in the light of a
God’s world.
In 1961, the novel won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, and
on Christmas Day, 1962 the film version of To
Kill A Mockingbird was released. As with any adaptation of a novel, there
some changes to narrative to fit a films linear nature. And while some subplots
and characters are dropped, the adaptation by Horton Foote is close to perfect
(he would win a well-deserved Academy Award for it). The performances are
perfect, including a brilliant, Oscar winning performance from the legendary
Gregory Peck. He acts with the greatest of ease and watching him glide through
this movie version is amazing. His ability to teach his children what is right,
especially Scout, about the evil of men without condemning them, without
sounding preachy, is what makes the difference between a trained actor and
someone who reads lines.
The child actors are also extraordinary, with both Phillip
Alford (Jem) and Mary Badham (Scout) showing the true innocence some child
actors possess; even the late John Megna (who seemed to have the stereotypical
Hollywood story of a bad post-childhood life, dying in 1995 at the age of 42
from complications from AIDS) breaths a life into young Dill, even though his
character changed much between the page and the screen.
Then there was Brock Peters as the stoic Tom Robbins and in
his film debut, Robert Duvall as the mysterious Boo Radley.
So yes, it took a long time for me to read the novel and see
the movie. And while I’ve been reading since I was 14, it just sometimes takes
me a while to set my mind to something like this (especially since I have a
tendency to read more popular fiction than anything else). Yes, PBS’ American
Masters finally got me to read the book, and a trip to Target had the movie on
sale, but I always knew I would get to them.
I’m happy that I finally did.
1 comment:
I have a long list of books I read when I was younger that I really need to read again. This is one of them. I love this book and Boo Radley is one of my favorite characters in literature, but I can't recall why anymore.
Post a Comment