I have never read a Kazuo Ishiguro
novel before. I know his books are deep, thoughtful tomes on the human condition.
I also know that to get what he’s trying to say, sometimes it requires a reader
to restart from the beginning because he chooses to hide meaning and action
under a cloud of beautiful prose. My decision to read this book, however, came about mostly because of its theme, the elements of fantasy I've been reading for three decades.
But while The Buried Giant is extraordinarily well written, it can be boring
as well. Even as well read as I think I am, I can't help
wonder if I missed some hushed imagery within the book. The story unfolds in a
rather straightforward way, at times the characters seem emotionally detached
from each other, despite the fact that the two main characters, Axl and
Beatrice do love each other unconditionally. Is the author aiming this book –along
with his other six- at group of smarter people who can comprehend some deeper
meaning from the story?
“The Buried Giant is set after the end of a war between Saxons and
Britons; they now live alongside each other, but warily. A widespread historical
amnesia grips the populace, erasing both recent and distant memory. Axl and
Beatrice, two elderly married Britons, call this forgetting “the mist.” Even
memories only a month or two old fade away. Axl and Beatrice once had a son,
who disappeared, but neither can quite remember him, or why he left them. They
embark on a journey to visit him, a quest that occupies the rest of the novel. In
the course of the journey, they encounter two knights: Wistan, a young Saxon
warrior, and Sir Gawain, an elderly and slightly buffoonish nephew of King
Arthur. There are adventures and battles with ogres, pixies, dragons, and
menacing soldiers. There are some sinister monks. Along the way, Beatrice and
Axl discover that “the mist” is actually the breath of a tyrannical she-dragon
named Querig, and that the only way to restore the country’s stolen memory will
be to kill Querig.”
The exploration
of this memory loss over the land and especially with Axl and Beatrice becomes repetitive
and annoying after a while, along with Axl calling Beatrice “princess” again
and again. It was as if the author’s story was already too short of an idea, so
he filled out the book with repeated notions that both were off to see this son
(whom ultimately becomes the MacGuffin) that went away
for some reason, that they both could not remember their
arguments (or why they could not have a candle), and that Beatrice had some
sort of limp, but it was no bother.
The book
starts out well, and along the way the reader think this is a sly Arthurian
themed tome, but the book quickly becomes sluggish and too repetitive to really
enjoy and recommend. It’s not fantasy, though it contains fantasy elements, and
readers of his previous six novels might be turned off by the idea that it
could be a fantasy.
I appreciate
authors whom can do something different in their writing, though. And while the
author likes fantasy novels, when writer Ursula Le Guin wondered if his long-time readers appreciate this adventure, he said “Will
readers follow me into this? Will they understand what I’m trying to do, or
will they be prejudiced against the surface elements? Are they going to say
this is fantasy?”
That answer
lies with them.
No comments:
Post a Comment