While reading The Handmaid’s Tale (starting it a days after
2016 general election), I got a sense that the story obviously comes from a
certain era in my timeline, a certain political epoch I would say. But reading
it now, for the first time, much of what happens in this book could come to
pass under future president Trump.
But Margret Atwood’s novel was released in 1985 at the
height of the Reagan era, when the Moral Majority and Christian anti-feminist
like Phyllis Schlafly and televangelist Tammy Faye-Bakker were riding the
American airwaves convinced that any and all problems the United States was
having can be easily blamed on all liberals, but their ire was mostly directed
a women and feminists, especially the hard line ones who eschewed traditional
roles of females in American society and, of course, gay men who refused, in
the age of AIDS, to be ignored anymore.
“Beginning with a staged terrorist attack (blamed on Islamic
extremists) that kills the President and most of Congress, a movement calling itself
the "Sons of Jacob" launches a revolution and suspends the United
States Constitution under the pretext of restoring order. They are quickly able
to take away all of women's rights, largely attributed to financial records
being stored electronically and labeled by gender. The new regime, the Republic
of Gilead, moves quickly to consolidate its power and reorganize society along
a new militarized, hierarchical, compulsory regime of Old Testament- -inspired
social and religious fanaticism among its newly created social classes. In this
new theocracy society, human rights are severely limited and women's rights are
unrecognized as almost all women are forbidden to read. The story is told in
the first person by a woman called Offred (literally Of-Fred). The character is
one of a class of women kept for reproductive purposes and known as
"handmaids" by the ruling class in an era of declining births due to
sterility from pollution and sexually transmitted diseases. Offred describes
her life during her third assignment as a handmaid, in this case to Fred
(referred to as "The Commander"). Interspersed in flashbacks are
portions of her life from before and during the beginning of the revolution,
when she finds she has lost all autonomy to her husband, through her failed
attempt to escape with her husband and daughter to Canada, to her
indoctrination into life as a handmaid.”
There is a lot of poetic gimmickry to this book, which was a bit
distracting for me, but the fact that the book has remained in print, is widely
read in AP course on literature in High Schools across the US (and would assume
Canada as well, considering Atwood is a Canadian) and is considered just as
important novel as 1984, A Clockwork Orange, and A Brave New World shows that
whatever plot devices Atwood used, it still a brilliant work of speculative
fiction.
While how the Sons of Jacob go about their coup d’etat is a
bit unrealistic today, and maybe back in the mid-1980s, it still all seems a possibility
as we moved forward with Donald Trump as our next president. The next 4 to 8
years will either lead the nation to a dystopian world of the 19th
century or (I would hope) a better United States. Still, I must also admit, the
worlds that made up the classic novel 1984 never materialized, along with many
other novels in this genre. Still, as Atwood has pointed out, everything that
does happen to these women has actually occurred over the centuries.
The question
is, can those things, that subjugation of women happen in 2017? Because men
like Trump, men like those in religious power, as writer Adi Robertson pointed
out in 2014 when talking about Atwood’s book, “don’t oppress women because they
hate or fear them, but because they can’t empathize enough to love them when it
becomes inconvenient.”
No comments:
Post a Comment